Thursday, November 26, 2009

Imagine A World Without Liberals

1. Ask a Question
2. Do Background Research
3. Construct a Hypothesis
4. Test Your Hypothesis by Doing an Experiment
5. Analyze Your Data and Draw a Conclusion
6. Communicate Your Results

1. Ask a question. "Do liberals have a brain?"

2. Do Background Research. There are mountains of research that prove liberals are lacking in brain power and in fact, are just plain stupid. For example, Woodrow Wilson allowed France to grind Germany under her hell at Versailles, in return for their support in the failed League of Nations. FDR trampled on the Constitution with his New "Raw" Deal and assisted his Uncle Joe Stalin in enslaving Eastern Europe at Yalta wherein he got nothing in return! JFK has his moments as well, what with the Bay of Pigs and the Cuban Missile Crisis where the Soviets took off a couple of missiles but the US gave up bases in Turkey and Iran that were listening in on the Soviets. LBJ was just one big idiot from start to finish and Carter alone proves the question above but in the interest of fairness, the evidence is still pouring in. Clinton with his open zipper and Obama and his MIA spine completes the process.

In the war arena, liberals continue to prove their gross lack of intelligence. Consider the Civil War and Lincoln's work in trying to hold the Union together. Who fought him at every turn? Democrats. Who were the Copperheads? Democrats. Perhaps the best example of this lack of intelligence is in the 60's and 70's where liberals spit on the troops returning from Vietnam as if THEY were the ones responsible. Not to be outdone is Senator Leaky Leahy who went out of his way in the 80's to leak enough classified material to keep the KGB busy for a decade! The Gunny is still trying to figure out why he was not prosecuted. Indeed, Ramsey Clark, a Democrat, aided and comforted the North Vietnamese as did Hanoi John Fonda Kerry, who sided with ABSCAM Murtha to aid and comfort al-qaeda in Iraq, while slandering the Marines. Code Pink, a wing of the Democrat Party continues to exhibit gross ignorance and a lack of intelligence with every action or spoken word.

3. Construct a Hypothesis. "Liberals lack the common sense and intelligence God gave normal people."

For example, liberals continue to deny that Islamic Jihad is alive and well in the U.S. for fear of upsetting CAIR and losing sight of their political correctness agenda. The DC Beltway sniper, now resting in Hell, has his investigation run by liberals in Montgomery County who disregarded tips that it was a couple of black men but instead, focused on white guys in work vans with white tubes on top. In the 90's Bill Clinton disregarded various acts of global terrorism directed at the USA:

Attack on U.S. Embassy in Moscow, September 13, 1995
Athens Embassy Attack, February 15, 1996
Khobar Towers Bombing, June 25, 1996
Empire State Building Sniper Attack, February 23, 1997
TWO U.S. Embassy Bombings in East Africa, August 7, 1998
Attack on U.S.S. Cole, October 12, 2000
US Embassy Manila Bombing, December 30, 2000

In order to pursue his adventures in the oral office. Indeed, Bill Clinton passed over several offers of Bin Laden from Sudanese officials because Monica was somewhat more important than say, national security. And the latest fumble is that Obama has decided that the mastermind behind 9/11 will be given a trial in New York by a civilian court instead of trial by a military tribunal. One can only wonder at the stunning lack of intelligence of putting a rabid jihadist murderer in front of a liberal media circus where he can encourage his followers to imitate his actions.

Now take your average American. If they received a tip that the DC beltway sniper was a black guy with a black accomplice driving a beat up car, it's likely, but not certain, that they'd focus on THAT and not white dudes in white work vans! And it's almost as certain that they would not give a damn about making the Islamofascists at CAIR mewl and cry by calling a terrorist a practicing member of a supposedly peaceful religion. And coming on the heels of that, if the average American witnessed terrorist act after terrorist act, coming from the practioners of the peaceful religion of Islam, chances are, they'd likely bomb the bejesus out of those involved. Again, not certain, but likely.

Thus it appears that the average American has a higher level of intelligence and common sense than liberals who often ignore blatant threats to the nation that they take an oath to protect.

4. Test Your Hypothesis by Doing an Experiment.

Let us examine, in the interest of science, how liberals react to certain things requiring a modicum of intelligence. Take for example, Ellsberg's leakage of the Pentagon Papers, classified Top Secret by the US Government. Liberals cheered this divulging of TS material to the enemy, in order to embarrass the evil Pentagon criminals. Ellsberg was cheered as a hero, not a criminal and of course, the liberal majority Congress did nothing to Ellsburg. Mark Felt, the "Deep Throat" who exposed Nixon at Watergate in retaliation for not being selected as the #1 guy in the FBI. Again, he was cheered as a hero even as he plunged the nation into chaos, division, and a government that was somewhat leaderless during the Cold War. And as with Ellsberg, liberals cheered him, Hillary Clinton worked to impeach Nixon (but defended her own husband's impeachment years later), and Felt was feted when he finally admitted it before he joined his liberal friends in the ninth level of Hell, where all liberals go. And WHO can forget Bill Clinton's National Security Chief who went into the National Archives to get rid of classified material that would show him and his boss to be AWOL as far as the fight against global terrorism went. Few liberals rose to demand that Berger be hung, then drawn and quartered for exposing classified material, destroying classified material, and for keeping the truth from coming out.

In the lastest catastrophe to hit the SS Libtanic, leaked emails about the covering up and deletion of data concerning the falsity of global warming have provoked a reaction from one Senator "Call me Senator please" Boxer.

"You call it Climategate, I call it E-mail-theft-gate. Whatever it is, the main issue is, are we facing global warming or are we not? I'm looking at these e-mails, that, even though they were stolen, are now out in the public. We may well have a hearing on this, we may not. We may have a briefing for senators, we may not. Part of our looking at this will be looking at a criminal activity which could have well been coordinated. This is a crime."

Now this is a good case-in-point for proving the hypothesis that, "Liberals lack the common sense and intelligence God gave normal people."

When the kid hacked Sarah Palin's emails and the Lapdog media published them, did Senator Babs complain about that? When TWO Democrat operatives in Florida listened into a conversation from Newt Gingrich and then released the transcript to Rep. Jim "Baghdad" McDermott,(D-Wa), who then gave it to the New York Times, who then published it, not only was Senator Boxer silently consenting to it but Democrats piously said the people had a right to know! There was nothing illegal here they said, and treated it like their party hacks has performed a great public service. Indeed, Senator Boxer's brain was MIA when Joe-the-Plumber's records were plundered in Ohio in an effort to assassinate his character after he outed lordgodking Obama's redistribution policies. And when the NY Obama Times leaked that we were tracking Osama by his satellite phone, Boxer was AWOL yet again. Silence is consent Babs.

Before Boxer finally proved the hypothesis, failed presidential candidate Hanoi John Fonda Kerry not only ignored the emails but had the temerity by calling for MORE U.S. funding of climate change efforts by poor nations to the tune of 3 BILLION US taxpayer dollars. "Democratic Senator John Kerry, a leading advocate of climate control legislation in Congress, recommended that the Obama administration include $3 billion in next year's budget to help fund efforts to address global warming. This year's funding is about one third that amount."

On the flip side, Conservative common sense and intelligence is brought to the forefront (as usual) when Senator Inhofe discussed the emails thusly: "For instance, one scientist wrote of a ‘trick he employed to ‘hide the decline’ in global temperature trends, as well as discussed attempts to ‘redefine what the peer-review literature is’ to prevent papers raising questions about anthropogenic global warming from appearing in IPCC reports. And that another scientist stated, ‘The fact is that we can’t account for the lack of warming and it is a travesty that we can’t.’ Still another wrote, “I tried hard to balance the needs of the science and the IPCC, which were not always the same.’"
Senator Boxer proves the lack of liberal common sense and intelligence by seeking to probe who leaked the emails vice the perfidy of the scientists who sought to put us under the yoke of the environazis. Moreover, those who leaked the emails, are not hackers as the liberal press decries but in reality, as whistleblowers. If he/she/they had not done what they did these liars, thieves and petty bureaucratic tyrants like Al Gorebuncle, Hansan at NASA, Waxman and Markey, etc, would still be attempting to pull another fast one, at great costs to the United States and the world!

Perhaps the hypothesis could be expanded to include that to liberals, the truth does not matter only the agenda does. That Senator Boxer could ignore the FACT that global warming science is based on falsified data and bogus results is criminal in and of itself. That Senator Boxer, Waxman, Obama, Gore, and the rest of them would have us throw trillions of dollars down the global warming rat-hole, destroy our economy over phony climate science, and relinquish our sovereignty as a nation to the IPCC, the UN, and libtyrants is simply unforgiveable. Boxer, like all liberals, is simply trying to divert and confuse the issue at hand. She has been beating the global warming drum for years, calling for Kyoto, castigating bush for NOT signing off on Kyoto, and now finds her house of cards has been built on a foundation of fraudulent data and corrupt climate models. Senator Boxer has pushed hard for the Crap and Tax legislation while knowing full well that her intellectual ignorance on the entire topic of climate change was felonious. It should be known that Senator Boxer is the top Democrat on the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee. SHE should have been themost knowledgeable one on this issue but as usual, ignorance and a lack of intelligence ruled the day for liberals.

The Constitution grants the House the power to impeach "The President, the Vice President, and all civil Officers of the United States." Jefferson's Manual, which is integral to the Rules of the House of Representatives, states that impeachment is set in motion by charges made on the floor, charges preferred by a memorial, a member's resolution referred to a committee, a message from the president, charges transmitted from the legislature of a state or territory or from a grand jury, or from facts developed and reported by an investigating committee of the House. It further states that a proposition to impeach is a question of high privilege in the House and at once supersedes business otherwise in order under the rules governing the order of business. The impeachment process is a two-step procedure. The House of Representatives must first pass by a simple majority articles of impeachment, which constitute the formal allegation or allegations. Upon their passage, the defendant has been "impeached". Next, the Senate tries the accused. In the case of the impeachment of a president, the Chief Justice of the United States presides over the proceedings. For the impeachment of any other official, the Constitution is silent on who shall preside, suggesting that this role falls to the Senate's usual presiding officer. This may include the impeachment of the vice president, although legal theories suggest that allowing a defendant to be the judge in their own case would be a blatant conflict of interest. If the Vice President did not preside over an impeachment (of anyone besides the President), the duties would fall to the President pro tempore of the Senate.

In order to convict the accused, a two-thirds majority of the Senators present is required. Conviction automatically removes the defendant from office. Following conviction, the Senate may vote to further punish the individual by barring them from holding future federal office, elected or appointed. Conviction by the Senate does not bar criminal prosecution.

Senator Boxer and her Global Warming frauds like Al Gore, Browner, and Holdren, could have cost the U.S. more in debts, lost manufacturing, freedoms, and living standards than all of the convicted criminals in our lifetimes. They are the ones who who should be prosecuted and put away for life. They have and are ruining our nation and have positioned themselves in a position of unaccountability while hampering or ruining those who actually have American interests at heart. Boxer and her minions are trying to pull off the biggest heist ever perpetrated against not only this country but the world! This fraud has cost us dearly and we the people want a redress of our grievences! This issue started in East Anglia University, which just so happens to be in England, not the United States, Senator Boxer, and thus, is not subject to US law. YOU, however, ARE subject to US law.

The Gunny fully supports an investigation. It should start with Senator Boxer, then extend to the Al Gore, Waxman, Markey, etc. And since Obama is a part of this, pledging GW support at Copenhagen (site of his recent defeat for a Chitcago Olympics bid), HE should be investigated as well. Al Gore has become filthy rich from this perpetrated hoax and the Marxist elites like Boxer have or will have cozy investments and arrangements in companies that were going to benefit from this fraudulent scheme. The actions of these people is nothing short of treason. Fraud is a crime. Conspiracy to commit fraud is a crime. Deleting or withholding valid information of the Freedom of Information Act requests is a crime. The "scientists" committed these crimes and people like Boxer, Pelosi, Gore, etc aided and abetted them.

5. Analyze Your Data and Draw a Conclusion.

In a nutshell, liberals are devoid of the common sense and intelligence God gave normal people. They continue to embrace the false religion of globull warming and seek to waste more of our money on this dead issue. The consensus is in, liberals are frigging dumber than dirt.

6. Communicate Your Results

This is an enormous case of organized scientific fraud and a criminal act against the citizens of this nation by the very leaders who are supposed to PROTECT us from this kind of garbage. Suborned by billions of taxpayer dollars devoted to climate research, dozens of prominent scientists like Hansen in NASA have established a criminal racket in which they seek government money, and the politicians have helped themselves to the pork. This is the worst kind of fraud because these criminals are held up as public heroes. They manipulated the data to protect a bigger lie and to prevent it from being outed by inconvenient facts and actual scientific criticisms. This is the scandal of the century. It needs to be thoroughly investigated by INDEPENDENT investigators and the culprits need to be brought to justice.
ImagineNoLiberals.jpg Imagine No Liberals image by travis70

1 comment:

  1. your imagine a world without picture... i mean, hey no rosie, gun control, U.N. etc. sounds great. but what in the name of god do you have against hybrid's. planned parenthood (or do you like single mothers on welfare?) multiculturalism, war protesters exercising their rights as Americans, that one country that made america possible, what was it, France, yeah, that one, and well, just anyone different from you in any way? no offence, but i dont think you and the founding fathers would be able to hang out for to long before they asked you to please leave thier country, with the attitude you seem to have.